| 1. |
Ease of navigating to the right part of the tree.
|
Very easy |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very hard |
| 2. |
Responsiveness of the tree when navigating.
|
Very good |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very poor |
| 3. |
Ease of reading text.
|
Very easy |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very hard |
| 4. |
Graphical design of the application.
|
Very good |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very poor |
| 5. |
Consistency of the application.
|
Very consistent |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very inconsistent |
| 6. |
Utility of hyperbolic tree for displaying hierarchy data.
|
Very useful |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Completely useless |
| 7. |
This application cares about my satisfaction as a user.
|
Very much |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Not at all |
| 8. |
Wikipedia integration into the Tree of Life interface.
|
Very good |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very poor |
| 9. |
Overall impression of the Tree of Life interface.
|
Very good
|
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Very bad
|
| 10. |
Would you like to further explore the Tree of Life
later on?
|
Definitely |
3 2 1 0 1 2 3
|
Never |